![]() |
Mid-Ohio Select Soccer League |
Return to the MOSSL Website...
Post A Response To This Message
| MESSAGE: | Player Development in The United States: Maintaining A Perspective by Mens National Team, http://www.mnyouthsoccer.org/coaches/articles/perspective.pdf U.S. Soccer believes that first and foremost youth soccer is a sport that players should experience and enjoy as a game with a focus on individual experimentation and development. U.S. Soccer encourages creating soccer environments that will help promote the players’ lifelong love of the sport. These environments should allow for the creativity, spontaneity and experimentation that the game of soccer naturally encourages. Too often, children are put into situations where development is secondary and winning is a priority, which leads to burnout and stifles individual skill development. We believe that a player’s development is enhanced when the short-term goals of a coach are pursued within the perspective of the player’s long-term needs. The following is a two-part commentary on the importance of (1) Having continuity and perspective in player development, and (2) Allowing children to experience soccer as it makes sense for their age and level of soccer maturity. Part one addresses the theoretical stages of player development and how each successive step is built upon the foundations established in the previous stage. In the second part, the current Men’s National Team coaching staff comment on the charge of their specific age group, and how it fits into the overall United States Men’s National Team program of development and success. The development of a player spans three general stages: (1) Youth level (ages 6-12) (2) Junior level (ages 13-17) (3) Senior level (ages 18 and older) A player’s chances of success at the Senior level are greatly enhanced by mastering the building blocks of soccer that are best addressed at the Youth and Junior levels. At the Youth level, ball skills, enjoyment of and experimentation within the game are key for a player’s development. At the Junior level, ball skills, enjoyment and insight into the game, with a gradual introduction to fitness, mental toughness and results. At this point, any success in winning matches should begin to be the product of a consistent and systematic approach to the game that focuses more on player development than on team-building. (The theory being that individually competent soccer players that are placed together on a team are more prepared to win than well-organized players who are unable to stand alone on their soccer abilities). At the Senior level, players need to use all these qualities together, along with a commitment to excellence, in order to figure out how to win. If a player skips a step at the Youth or Junior levels, he will find success and enjoyment more difficult as he moves toward the senior level. At the Youth and Junior levels, there are several points to address when discussing how to achieve these goals: (1) The game is the best teacher - let the kids learn from it by setting up opportunities for them to play (2) Allow kids to learn in environments that are sensitive to age and abilities (emotional and athletic) and that offer a variety of experiences. (3) Age and ability competition is a central element in a player’s development. (4) At the youth level, a competitive environment is not a result-oriented environment. The differences must be clear. A competitive environment at the youth level encourages decisions from player and coach alike that focus on performance rather than results. (Favoring ball skill and inventiveness as the means to find success within the rules and spirit of the game) (5) At the junior level, technical skill and attacking soccer are still important themes, but now there is a greater focus on developing players’ insight into the game by emphasizing the role of the game itself as a forum for learning. (Still focusing on the performance, rather than the result) (6) At the youth and junior levels, matches are important as a means to player development (enjoyment, ball skill, insight, fitness), not as the aim. The usefulness of the game, in this respect, can occur in many different forms, from the 4v4 to the full-sided match model. Even at the Senior level, the game still offers opportunities for growth – only the weight of balance between factors such as enjoyment, ball skill, insight, fitness and results shift more toward the latter. |
| Responses |
| ripmeister On 10/5/2009 11:17:37 AM Thanks for posting this. This has been my soapbox issue for years. One need no further proof than the performance of the US U20 team at the U20 World Cup in Egypt. Players are not comfortable on the ball, they lack creativity and problem solving and they are completely predictable playing the longball, kickball style of game. As long as the US maintains this approach to the game we will never compete regularly on the world stage IMO. My sons have played for one of those types of clubs that you mention above that does take the player centered approach. As you point out this is quite tough at the early ages because the "wins" are few and far between. Unfortunately there are too many parents who don't get it and they gravitate to the area clubs that tout there state cup teams etc. These tend to be the larger clubs where many players try out, giving these clubs just what they are looking for, that being the most athletic, biggest and fastest kids. At the early ages this works when you kick the ball to the corner and outrun everybody. On the flip side, the teams that encourage creativity and comfort on the ball by trying to maintain possession or "make a move" lose the ball a lot and hence lose games. I've also noticed that a lot of parents bail on these clubs due to a lack of "wins" and the hands off approach to coaching at the early ages. This results in a numbers problem for these types of clubs. However, if one can have patience by the time these kids get to U13/14 the alternative approach begins to bear fruit as skill and creativity begin to take over athleticism. This is a beautiful thing to see and frankly a much more fun style of soccer to watch. One of my older sons coaches once told me when I asked why they didn't do more drills and focus on strategy that we Americans want everything out of the microwave. We want instant wins and instant soccer players. It doesn't happen that way if what you want are the Messi's, Ronaldos, Ronaldhinos or Schellotos. I think the best example of where the "American" system is failing is in terms of the womens national team. For years we dominated world soccer because we were always more athletic. Over the past decade the rest of the world has caught up. The Brazilians have surpassed us and IMO it has primarily to do with the way the game is taught and learned there. |
| ameil43065 On 10/5/2009 8:21:01 AM CAFC. Your welcome. There are a few clubs in Columbus that follow this model so if you have a child and your club/coach does not follow this model keep looking until you find the right one. I hate to see parents settle for second class coaching just because the club is close to home. If children want to be successful in soccer they have to have positive professional coaching to help develop their potential whatever that might be (rec or select)/college bound and high school bound. A few children may have natural talent and will beat the odds and succeed without professional coaching but those children are far and in between. |
| CAFC On 10/5/2009 7:57:05 AM Thanks for posting this! It does not seem to be followed currently in the US. Winning seems to be the most important factor, thus the playing time issue. Maybe if the US followed this model in player development we would be further ahead, we are not...for example the US under 20 just got killed by South Korea.?? |